Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22532806›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Competition between replicative and translesion polymerases during homologous recombination repair in Drosophila.

Daniel P Kane, Michael Shusterman, Yikang Rong, Mitch McVey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. POLD3 as Controller of Replicative DNA Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Host translesion polymerases are required for viral genome integrity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of genome evolution in Candida albicans.Current opinion in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  13. TheGenetics · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Break-induced replication links microsatellite expansion to complex genome rearrangements.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Multiple mechanisms contribute to double-strand break repair at rereplication forks in Drosophila follicle cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel P KaneDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael Shusterman
Yikang Rong
Mitch McVey
Tufts University · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

DNA Double Strand Break Repair in Drosophila MelanogasterZIABC010446 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RONG, YIKANG · 2009 to 2015
$6.9M
Mechanisms and consequences of inaccurate DNA double-strand break repairR01GM092866 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI MCVEY, MITCH · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092866NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM092866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In metazoans, the mechanism by which DNA is synthesized during homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks is poorly understood. Specifically, the identities of the polymerase(s) that carry out repair synthesis and how they are recruited to repair sites are unclear. Here, we have investigated the roles of several different polymerases during homologous recombination repair in Drosophila melanogaster. Using a gap repair assay, we found that homologous recombination is impaired in Drosophila lacking DNA polymerase zeta and, to a lesser extent, polymerase eta. In addition, the Pol32 protein, part of the polymerase delta complex, is needed for repair requiring extensive synthesis. Loss of Rev1, which interacts with multiple translesion polymerases, results in increased synthesis during gap repair. Together, our findings support a model in which translesion polymerases and the polymerase delta complex compete during homologous recombination repair. In addition, they establish Rev1 as a crucial factor that regulates the extent of repair synthesis.

Indexed as

DNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIIAnimalsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA ReplicationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMutant ProteinsRecombinational DNA RepairY-Family DNA PolymerasesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIIDNA polymerase zetaDrosophila ProteinsMutant ProteinsRad30 proteinY-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID22532806
PMCPMC3330096
OpenAlexW2154762186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.