Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22532756›Full record

ArticleThe Analysis of verbal behavior2011

Further evaluation of prompting tactics for establishing intraverbal responding in children with autism.

Einar T Ingvarsson, Duy D Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analysis of verbal behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the use of programmed reinforcement in a correction procedure with children diagnosed with autism.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Verbal Stimulus Control and the Intraverbal Relation.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2016
    Article
  11. Empirical Investigations of the Intraverbal: 2005-2015.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Einar T IngvarssonUniversity of North Texas, Child Study Center, Fort Worth.
Duy D Le

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared prompting tactics to establish intraverbal responding (question answering) in four boys with autism. Based on the results of intraverbal, textual, echoic, and tact pretests, we compared vocal and picture prompts with three participants, and textual, vocal, and picture prompts with one participant. We also evaluated repeated acquisition with different question sets, and included a concurrent-chains arrangement, in which initial link selections determined which prompting procedure occurred in the terminal link. All the prompting procedures were effective in establishing intraverbal responding, but vocal prompts resulted in the fewest trials to criterion for all four participants during the initial prompt comparison. However, the results were less consistent for the second comparison. The concurrent chains arrangement revealed a clear preference for picture prompts for one participant, but the results for the others were inconclusive.

Indexed as

autismconcurrent-chains assessmentintraverbal trainingprompting procedurestransfer of stimulus controlverbal behavior

Identifiers

PMID22532756
PMCPMC3139551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.