Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22532699›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2012

Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery.

Andy Judge, Nigel K Arden, Cyrus Cooper, M Kassim Javaid, Andrew J Carr, Richard E Field, Paul A Dieppe

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03628378 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Outcomes in Free-hand Versus Sensor-guided Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled130ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsVerasense
NCT06180486 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Mindfulness Meditation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsTotal Knee Replacement, Mediation, FeasibilityArmsMindfulness Meditation Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. The reason why orthopaedic surgeons perform total knee replacement: results of a randomised study using case vignettes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Trial
  17. Guided Imagery for Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2016
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andy JudgeOxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK. andrew.judge@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Nigel K Arden
Cyrus Cooper
M Kassim Javaid
Andrew J Carr
Richard E Field
Paul A Dieppe

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10064Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify pre-operative predictors of patient-reported outcomes of primary total knee replacement (TKR) surgery.

methodsThe Elective Orthopaedic Centre database is a large prospective cohort of 1991 patients receiving primary TKR in south-west London from 2005 to 2008. The primary outcome is the 6-month post-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS). To classify whether patients had a clinically important outcome, we calculated a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the 6-month OKS related to satisfaction with surgery. Potential predictor variables were pre-operative OKS, age, sex, BMI, deprivation, surgical side, diagnosis, operation type, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and EQ5D anxiety/depression. Regression modelling was used to identify predictors of outcome.

resultsThe strongest determinants of outcome include pre-operative pain/function-those with less severe pre-operative disease obtain the best outcomes; diagnosis in relation to pain outcome-patients with RA did better than those with OA; deprivation-those living in poorer areas had worse outcomes; and anxiety/depression-worse pre-operative anxiety/depression led to worse pain. Differences were observed between predictors of pain and functional outcomes. Diagnosis of RA and anxiety/depression were associated with pain, whereas age and gender were specifically associated with function. BMI was not a clinically important predictor of outcome.

conclusionThis study identified clinically important predictors of attained pain/function post-TKR. Predictors of pain were not necessarily the same as functional outcomes, which may be important in the context of a patient's expectations of surgery. Other predictive factors need to be identified to improve our ability to recognize patients at risk of poor TKR outcomes.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainPatient SatisfactionPostoperative Period

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.