Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22532465›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2012

Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials.

Mark Nelson, Gerardo Amaya, Nathan Clumeck, Clovis Arns da Cunha, Dushyantha Jayaweera, Patrice Junod, Taisheng Li, Pablo Tebas, Marita Stevens, Annemie Buelens and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00540449 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of TMC278 25 mg q.d. Versus Efavirenz 600mg q.d. in Combination With a Fixed Background Regimen Consisting of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Emtricitabine in Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects.

TypeinterventionalSponsorTibotec Pharmaceuticals, IrelandRan2008 to 2011Enrolled694ConditionsHIV Infections, HIV-1, Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1ArmsTMC278, Efavirenz
NCT00543725 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of TMC278 25mg q.d. Versus Efavirenz 600mg q.d. in Combination With a Background Regimen Containing 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects.

TypeinterventionalSponsorTibotec Pharmaceuticals, IrelandRan2008 to 2012Enrolled680ConditionsHIV Infections, HIV-1ArmsTMC278, efavirenz
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Coinfection and Concurrent Diseases Core Research Group: 2016 Updated Canadian HIV/Hepatitis C Adult Guidelines for Management and Treatment.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Not Available].The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Coinfection and Concurrent Diseases Core: Canadian guidelines for management and treatment of HIV/hepatitis C coinfection in adults.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark NelsonChelsea and Westminster Hospital, St Stephen's Centre, London, UK. mark.nelson@chelwest.nhs.uk
Gerardo Amaya
Nathan Clumeck
Clovis Arns da Cunha
Dushyantha Jayaweera
Patrice Junod
Taisheng Li
Pablo Tebas
Marita Stevens
Annemie Buelens
Simon Vanveggel
Katia Boven
ECHO and THRIVE Study Groups
Janssen (Belgium) · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BEChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJanssen (United States) · USPennsylvania Hospital · USUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe efficacy and hepatic safety of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors rilpivirine (TMC278) and efavirenz were compared in treatment-naive, HIV-infected adults with concurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the pooled week 48 analysis of the Phase III, double-blind, randomized ECHO (NCT00540449) and THRIVE (NCT00543725) trials.

methodsPatients received 25 mg of rilpivirine once daily or 600 mg of efavirenz once daily, plus two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. At screening, patients had alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels ≤5× the upper limit of normal. HBV and HCV status was determined at baseline by HBV surface antigen, HCV antibody and HCV RNA testing.

resultsHBV/HCV coinfection status was known for 670 patients in the rilpivirine group and 665 in the efavirenz group. At baseline, 49 rilpivirine and 63 efavirenz patients [112/1335 (8.4%)] were coinfected with either HBV [55/1357 (4.1%)] or HCV [57/1333 (4.3%)]. The safety analysis included all available data, including beyond week 48. Eight patients seroconverted during the study (rilpivirine: five; efavirenz: three). A higher proportion of patients achieved viral load <50 copies/mL (intent to treat, time to loss of virological response) in the subgroup without HBV/HCV coinfection (rilpivirine: 85.0%; efavirenz: 82.6%) than in the coinfected subgroup (rilpivirine: 73.5%; efavirenz: 79.4%) (rilpivirine, P = 0.04 and efavirenz, P = 0.49, Fisher's exact test). The incidence of hepatic adverse events (AEs) was low in both groups in the overall population (rilpivirine: 5.5% versus efavirenz: 6.6%) and was higher in HBV/HCV-coinfected patients than in those not coinfected (26.7% versus 4.1%, respectively).

conclusionsHepatic AEs were more common and response rates lower in HBV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with rilpivirine or efavirenz than in those who were not coinfected.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlanine TransaminaseAlkynesAnimalsAntiviral AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesBenzoxazinesCoinfectionCyclopropanesDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensAlanine TransaminaseAlkynesAntiviral AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis C AntibodiesNitrilesPlacebosPyrimidinesRilpivirine

Identifiers

PMID22532465
PMCPMC4643643
OpenAlexW2132773843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.