Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22531881›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2012

Manifold beneficial effects of acetyl salicylic acid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on sepsis.

Damon P Eisen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of platelets in sepsis: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Roles of ginsenosides in sepsis.Journal of ginseng research · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damon P EisenVictorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia. damon.eisen@mh.org.au
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcetyl salicylic acid (ASA) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have potential as adjunctive agents for sepsis. MATERIALS: This review considers the large body of literature that indicates a basis for sepsis therapy with ASA and suggests an agenda for future intervention studies in sepsis prevention and treatment. ASA and NSAIDs have beneficial effects in numerous experimental models of sepsis. Low doses of ASA of 100 mg/day or less trigger synthesis of lipoxins that are anti-inflammatory and aid in resolution of inflammation. Higher doses of ASA and NSAIDs act to reduce NF-κB stimulation and inhibit numerous septic pathways. While a previous randomised controlled trial of ibuprofen failed to show a reduction in mortality in sepsis, it did reduce clinical manifestations of sepsis. More recent observational studies have shown reduction in sepsis or acute lung injury leading to lower mortality in ICU patients treated with ASA.

conclusionsLow-dose ASA appears to be beneficial in the prevention and treatment of sepsis and SIRS. If proven, this intervention would have a major, cost-effective impact on sepsis care.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInflammationLipoxinsNF-kappa BSepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinLipoxinsNF-kappa B

Identifiers

PMID22531881
OpenAlexW2170690085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.