Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22531485›Full record

Trial reportMolecular pain2012

Lidocaine patch (5%) is no more potent than placebo in treating chronic back pain when tested in a randomised double blind placebo controlled brain imaging study.

Javeria A Hashmi, Marwan N Baliki, Lejian Huang, Elle L Parks, Mona L Chanda, Thomas Schnitzer, A Vania Apkarian

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular pain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03294148 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Mind-body Treatments for Chronic Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, BoulderRan2017 to 2019Enrolled151ConditionsChronic Pain, Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, Back Pain, LowArmsOpen-Label Placebo Treatment for Chronic Back Pain, Psychotherapy Treatment for Chronic Back Pain
NCT04378959 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial Evaluating Topical Lidocaine Patch(es) for Mechanical Neck Pain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled76ConditionsNeck Pain, Neck Pain, PosteriorArmsLidocaine patch, Placebo patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Topical Lidocaine for Chronic Pain Treatment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Javeria A HashmiDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Marwan N Baliki
Lejian Huang
Elle L Parks
Mona L Chanda
Thomas Schnitzer
A Vania Apkarian
Northwestern University · US

Funding

CORTICAL PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF PAINR01NS035115 · NINDS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI APKARIAN, APKAR VANIA · 1996 to 2013
$5.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS35115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5% Lidocaine patch is used for treating chronic neuropathic pain conditions such as chronic back pain (CBP), diabetic neuropathy and complex regional pain syndrome, but is effective in a variable proportion of patients. Our lab has reported that this treatment reduces CBP intensity and associated brain activations when tested in an open labelled preliminary study. Notably, effectiveness of the 5% Lidocaine patch has not been tested against placebo for treating CBP. In this study, effectiveness of the 5% Lidocaine patch was compared with placebo in 30 CBP patients in a randomised double-blind study where 15 patients received 5% Lidocaine patches and the remaining patients received placebo patches. Functional MRI was used to identify brain activity for fluctuations of spontaneous pain, at baseline and at two time points after start of treatment (6 hours and 2 weeks).

resultsThere was no significant difference between the treatment groups in either pain intensity, sensory and affective qualities of pain or in pain related brain activation at any time point. However, 50% patients in both the Lidocaine and placebo arms reported a greater than 50% decrease in pain suggesting a marked placebo effect. When tested against an untreated CBP group at similar time points, the patch treated subjects showed significantly greater decrease in pain compared to the untreated group (n = 15).

conclusionsThese findings suggest that although the 5% Lidocaine is not better than placebo in its effectiveness for treating pain, the patch itself induces a potent placebo effect in a significant proportion of CBP patients.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingTransdermal PatchBack PainBrainBrain MappingChronic PainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedPlacebo EffectLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID22531485
PMCPMC3475108
OpenAlexW2118686070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.