Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22530584›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2012

The potential use of toxin antibodies as a strategy for controlling acute Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Gordon Y C Cheung, Michael Otto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Critical Assessment of the Prospects of Quorum-Quenching Therapy forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Accessory Gene Regulator (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances inInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutic Targeting of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gordon Y C CheungLaboratory of Human Bacterial Pathogenesis, NIAID, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Michael Otto
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Staphylococcal pathogenesisZIAAI000904 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI OTTO, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2025
$22.6M
CAP: PSM-Based Vaccines to Protect from MRSA InfectionZIAAI001166 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI OTTO, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2013
$230k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe pandemic human pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus, displays high levels of antibiotic resistance and is a major cause of hospital- and community-associated infections. S. aureus disease manifestation is to a great extent due to the production of a large arsenal of virulence factors, which include a series of secreted toxins. Antibodies to S. aureus toxins are found in people who are infected or asymptomatically colonized with S. aureus. Immunotherapies consisting of neutralizing anti-toxin antibodies could provide immediate aid to patients with impaired immune systems or in advanced stages of disease. AREAS COVERED: Important S. aureus toxins, their roles in pathogenesis, rationales for selecting S. aureus toxins for immunization efforts, and caveats associated with monoclonal antibody-based passive immunization are discussed. This review will focus on hyper-virulent community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus because of their recent surge and clinical importance. EXPERT OPINION: Antibodies against genome-encoded toxins may be more broadly applicable than those directed against toxins found only in a sub-population of S. aureus isolates. Furthermore, there is substantial functional redundancy among S. aureus toxins. Thus, an optimal anti-S. aureus formulation may consist of multiple antibodies directed against a series of key S. aureus genome-encoded toxins.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsHumansImmunotherapyMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID22530584
PMCPMC3354029
OpenAlexW2008508169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.