Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22530013›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Polysaccharide specific monoclonal antibodies provide passive protection against intranasal challenge with Burkholderia pseudomallei.

David P AuCoin, Dana E Reed, Nicole L Marlenee, Richard A Bowen, Peter Thorkildson, Barbara M Judy, Alfredo G Torres, Thomas R Kozel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Vaccines · 2024
    Review
  5. Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Evolutionary Arms Race BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Development of Immunoassays forThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David P AuCoinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, United States of America. daucoin@medicine.nevada.edu
Dana E Reed
Nicole L Marlenee
Richard A Bowen
Peter Thorkildson
Barbara M Judy
Alfredo G Torres
Thomas R Kozel
University of Nevada, Reno · USColorado State University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
B. anthracis:passive immunization with anticapsular mAbR01AI059348 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI KOZEL, THOMAS R · 2004 to 2012
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030065NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-30065NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059348NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359NIAID NIH HHS U54AI065359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative bacillus that is the causative agent of melioidosis. The bacterium is inherently resistant to many antibiotics and mortality rates remain high in endemic areas. The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and capsular polysaccharide (CPS) are two surface-associated antigens that contribute to pathogenesis. We previously developed two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific to the CPS and LPS; the CPS mAb was shown to identify antigen in serum and urine from melioidosis patients. The goal of this study was to determine if passive immunization with CPS and LPS mAbs alone and in combination would protect mice from a lethal challenge with B. pseudomallei. Intranasal (i.n.) challenge experiments were performed with B. pseudomallei strains 1026b and K96423. Both mAbs provided significant protection when administered alone. A combination of mAbs was protective when low doses were administered. In addition, combination therapy provided a significant reduction in spleen colony forming units (cfu) compared to results when either the CPS or LPS mAbs were administered alone.

Indexed as

Immunization, PassiveAbscessAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialBurkholderia pseudomalleiEpitopesFemaleMelioidosisMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPolysaccharidesSpleenAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialEpitopesPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID22530013
PMCPMC3328442
OpenAlexW1987790354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.