Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22529302›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2012

Second generation endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding: network meta-analysis.

J P Daniels, L J Middleton, R Champaneria, K S Khan, K Cooper, B W J Mol, S Bhattacharya, International Heavy Menstrual Bleeding IPD Meta-analysis Collaborative Group

Abstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Anticoagulant therapy for women: implications for menstruation, pregnancy, and lactation.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  9. CavatermCaspian journal of internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J P DanielsUniversity of Birmingham, Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. j.p.daniels@bham.ac.uk
L J Middleton
R Champaneria
K S Khan
K Cooper
B W J Mol
S Bhattacharya
International Heavy Menstrual Bleeding IPD Meta-analysis Collaborative Group

Funding

Department of Health 05/45/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the relative effectiveness of second generation ablation techniques in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.

designNetwork meta-analysis on the primary outcome measures of amenorrhoea, heavy bleeding, and patients' dissatisfaction with treatment. DATA SOURCES: Nineteen randomised controlled trials (involving 3287 women) were identified through electronic searches of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases from inception to April 2011. The reference lists of known relevant articles were searched for further articles. Two reviewers independently selected articles without language restrictions. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials involving second generation endometrial destruction techniques for women with heavy menstrual bleeding unresponsive to medical treatment.

resultsOf the three most commonly used techniques, network meta-analysis showed that bipolar radiofrequency and microwave ablation resulted in higher rates of amenorrhoea than thermal balloon ablation at around 12 months (odds ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.53 to 4.12, P<0.001; and 1.66, 1.01 to 2.71, P=0.05, respectively), but there was no evidence of a convincing difference between the three techniques in the number of women dissatisfied with treatment or still experiencing heavy bleeding. Compared with bipolar radio frequency and microwave devices, an increased number of women still experienced heavy bleeding after free fluid ablation (2.19, 1.07 to 4.50, P=0.03; and 2.91, 1.23 to 6.88, P=0.02, respectively). Compared with radio frequency ablation, free fluid ablation was associated with reduced rates of amenorrhoea (0.36, 0.19 to 0.67, P=0.004) and increased rates of dissatisfaction (4.79, 1.07 to 21.5, P=0.04). Of the less commonly used devices, endometrial laser intrauterine thermotherapy was associated with increased rates of amenorrhoea compared with all the other devices, while cryoablation led to a reduced rate compared with bipolar radio frequency and microwave.

conclusionsBipolar radio frequency and microwave ablative devices are more effective than thermal balloon and free fluid ablation in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with second generation endometrial ablation devices.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationCryosurgeryLaser CoagulationAlgorithmsConfidence IntervalsEndometrial Ablation TechniquesEndometriumFemaleHumansHysteroscopyMenorrhagiaMicrowavesOdds RatioPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22529302
PMCPMC3339574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.