Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22529279›Full record

SynthesisPediatrics2012

Pharmacologic treatment of repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders: evidence of publication bias.

Melisa Carrasco, Fred R Volkmar, Michael H Bloch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Dosing and Monitoring: Children and Adolescents.Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melisa CarrascoNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2215, USA. melcarr@umich.edu
Fred R Volkmar
Michael H Bloch
Yale University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
Longitudinal Structural MRI Study of Adulthood Outcome in Tourette SyndromeK23MH091240 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOCH, MICHAEL H · 2010 to 2014
$902k
Neural mechanisms underlying obsessive Compulsiveness in ASDF31MH086273 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CARRASCO MCCAUL, MELISA · 2009 to 2011
$90k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139NIMH NIH HHS 1K23MH091240-01NIMH NIH HHS 5F31MH086273-03NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH086273NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH091240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of serotonin receptor inhibitors (SRIs) for the treatment of repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

methodsTwo reviewers searched PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of SRIs for repetitive behaviors in ASD. Our primary outcome was mean improvement in ratings scales of repetitive behavior. Publication bias was assessed by using a funnel plot, the Egger's test, and a meta-regression of sample size and effect size.

resultsOur search identified 5 published and 5 unpublished but completed trials eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of 5 published and 1 unpublished trial (which provided data) demonstrated a small but significant effect of SRI for the treatment of repetitive behaviors in ASD (standardized mean difference: 0.22 [95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.37], z score = 2.87, P < .005). There was significant evidence of publication bias in all analyses. When Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill method was used to adjust for the effect of publication bias, there was no longer a significant benefit of SRI for the treatment of repetitive behaviors in ASD (standardized mean difference: 0.12 [95% confidence interval: -0.02 to 0.27]). Secondary analyses demonstrated no significant effect of type of medication, patient age, method of analysis, trial design, or trial duration on reported SRI efficacy.

conclusionsMeta-analysis of the published literature suggests a small but significant effect of SRI in the treatment of repetitive behaviors in ASD. This effect may be attributable to selective publication of trial results. Without timely, transparent, and complete disclosure of trial results, it remains difficult to determine the efficacy of available medications.

Indexed as

Publication BiasAntidepressive AgentsChildChild Development Disorders, PervasiveDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsStereotyped BehaviorStereotypic Movement DisorderAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22529279
PMCPMC3340598
OpenAlexW2135630848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.