ArticleArchives of internal medicine2012
Primary care providers' response to the US Preventive Services Task Force draft recommendations on screening for prostate cancer.
Article in Archives of internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Use of the prostate-specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.Preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening.International journal of general medicine · 2018Article
- Commentary: Building an Evidence Base for Promoting Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: An Overview of a Cancer Prevention and Control Program.Ethnicity & disease · 2017Article
- The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.Nature reviews. Urology · 2017Review
- Getting Black Men to Undergo Prostate Cancer Screening: The Role of Social Capital.American journal of men's health · 2015Article
- Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Grade D Recommendation: Assessment of Evaluations for Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsies in a Large Urology Group Practice Following Statement Revision.Reviews in urology · 2015Article
- Identification of an antibody fragment specific for androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells.BMC biotechnology · 2014Article
- A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on recommendations of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer.BJU international · 2014Article
- Article
- Comparison of prostate cancer diagnosis in patients receiving unrelated urological and non-urological cancer care.BJU international · 2013Article
- Prostate-specific antigen testing in men aged 40-64 years: impact of publication of clinical trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2013Article
- Primary care physicians' use of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening.Annals of family medicineArticle
- Multilevel Small Area Estimation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Test in the United States by Age Group: 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.