Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22528883›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2012

The central complex of the flesh fly, Neobellieria bullata: recordings and morphologies of protocerebral inputs and small-field neurons.

James Phillips-Portillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. A connectome of theeLife · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multisensory control of navigation in the fruit fly.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Widespread sensitivity to looming stimuli and small moving objects in the central complex of an insect brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James Phillips-PortilloDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. phillipj@email.arizona.edu
University of Arizona · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY OF SIMPLE OCULOMOTOR SYSTEMR01RR008688 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI STRAUSFELD, NICHOLAS J · 1992 to 2008
$2.6M
GRADUATE TRAINING IN SYSTEMS AND INTERGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGYT32GM008400 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HOYER, PATRICIA B · 1991 to 2011
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR008688NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008400NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM08400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central complex in the brains of insects is a series of midline neuropils involved in motor control, sensory integration, and associative learning. To understand better the role of this center and its supply of sensory information, intracellular recordings and dye fills were made of central complex neurons in the fly, Neobellieria bullata. Recordings were obtained from 24 neurons associated with the ellipsoid body, fan-shaped body, and protocerebral bridge, all of which receive both visual and mechanosensory information from protocerebral centers. One neuron with dendrites in an area of the lateral protocerebrum associated with motion-sensitive outputs from the optic lobes invades the entire protocerebral bridge and was driven by visual motion. Inputs to the fan-shaped body and ellipsoid body responded both to visual stimuli and to air puffs directed at the head and abdomen. Intrinsic neurons in both of these structures respond to changes in illumination. A putative output neuron connecting the protocerebral bridge, the fan-shaped body, and one of the lateral accessory lobes showed opponent responses to moving visual stimuli. These recordings identify neurons with response properties previously known only from extracellular recordings in other species. Dye injections into neurons connecting the central complex with areas of the protocerebrum suggest that some classes of inputs into the central complex are electrically coupled.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningCell ShapeElectrophysiologyFemaleGanglia, InvertebrateMaleMicroelectrodesNeural PathwaysOptic Lobe, NonmammalianPhotic StimulationPupaSarcophagidaeSensory Receptor CellsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22528883
PMCPMC4074547
OpenAlexW1972682329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.