ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2012
Searching for new genetic variations in expression databases for the GABAergic and glutamatergic systems.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in gene expression and genetic variations in coding regions have likely functional impact, potentially associated with complex diseases, such as neuropsychiatric conditions. A current need for high throughput analysis of genomic data is leading to the development and improvement of sophisticated bioinformatics approaches, which allows the processing of large amounts of sequence and gene expression data. In this study, we identified new potential genetic variations prioritizing genes related to glutamatergic and GABAergic systems, using different bioinformatics resources. The CLCbio Workbench Combined platform was initially used to build expressed sequence tags and mRNA files retrieved, respectively, from the Goldenpath and National Center for Biotechnology Information databases and latter to perform multiple batches of Smith-Waterman alignments. The PMUT software was used to increase an accurate association between potential variations and pathogenic predictions. The annotation revealed various classes of variations and most of them are deletions ranging from 1 to 7 bp. Bioinformatic pipelines seem to be useful approaches to help screening for genetic variations with potential impact in gene expression. Further analysis will foster this aim to provide celerity at the massive analysis of data currently generated in large scale high throughput experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22528461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.