ArticleFolia microbiologica2012
Excretome of the chitinolytic bacterium Clostridium paraputrificum J4.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alterations in ileal mucosa bacteria related to diet complexity and growth performance in young pigs.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Chitinase Chit62J4 Essential for Chitin Processing by Human Microbiome BacteriumMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Microbial Succession of Anaerobic Chitin Degradation in Freshwater Sediments.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Genome Sequence of Clostridium paraputrificum 373-A1 Isolated in Chile from a Patient Infected with Clostridium difficile.Genome announcements · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A strictly anaerobic mesophilic chitinolytic bacterial strain identified as Clostridium paraputrificum J4 was isolated from human feces. In response to various types of growth substrates, the bacterium produced an array of chitinolytic enzymes representing significant components of the J4 strain secretome. The excreted active proteins were characterized by estimating the enzymatic activities of endochitinase, exochitinase, and N-acetylglucosaminidase induced by cultivation in medium M-10 with colloidal chitin. The enzyme activities produced by J4 strain cultivated in medium M-10 with glucose were significantly lower. The spectrum of extracellularly excreted proteins was separated by SDS-PAGE. The chitinase variability was confirmed on zymograms of renatured SDS-PAGE. The enzymes were visualized under ultraviolet light by using 4-methylumbelliferyl derivatives of N-acetyl-β-D: -glucosaminide, N,N´-diacetyl-β-D: -chitobiose, or N,N´,N˝-triacetyl-β-D: -chitotriose for β-N-acetylglucosaminidase, chitobiosidase, or endochitinase activities, respectively. Protein components of the secretome were separated by 2D-PAGE analysis. The distinct protein bands were excised, isolated, and subsequently characterized by using MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometry. The final identification was performed according to sequence homology by database searching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.