ArticleFolia microbiologica2012
Intestinal bacterial population of healthy rats during the administration of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Chitosan Oligosaccharide Ameliorates Metabolic Syndrome Induced by OvernutritionFrontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Animal-Origin Prebiotics Based on Chitin: An Alternative for the Future? A Critical Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Diets with and without edible cricket support a similar level of diversity in the gut microbiome of dogs.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Sex-dependent impact of Roundup on the rat gut microbiome.Toxicology reports · 2018Article
- Chitooligosaccharides promote radiosensitivity in colon cancer line SW480.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of the administration of chitosan (CS) and chitooligosaccharides (COS) on rat fecal microbiota was analyzed in this study. The profile of total bacterial population was monitored during 3 weeks of CS or COS application using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Quantitative PCR was used for monitoring possible changes in the levels of total bacteria and the levels of individual bacterial groups: Bifidobacteria, Clostridium leptum, Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus-Streptococcus-Enterobacter, and Bacteroides-Prevotella. The DGGE profiles revealed a high complexity and individuality of each tested subject, and variations in the composition of band pattern were observed. CS or COS per os administration changed the profile and structure of the microbial ecosystem of the gastrointestinal tract of healthy rats. COS have, in most cases, an opposite effect compared with CS; only the Bacteroides-Prevotella bacterial group and Enterobacteriaceae were influenced in the same way. The Bifidobacteria group was not influenced by the administration CS and COS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.