Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22528121›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2012

Systems immunology: a survey of modeling formalisms, applications and simulation tools.

Vipin Narang, James Decraene, Shek-Yoon Wong, Bindu S Aiswarya, Andrew R Wasem, Shiang Rong Leong, Alexandre Gouaillard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Future of Burn Care From a Complexity Science Perspective.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Mapping CAR T-Cell Design Space Using Agent-Based Models.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Simulation modelling for immunologists.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2020
    Review
  8. A case for the reuse and adaptation of mechanistic computational models to study transplant immunology.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Solving Immunology?Trends in immunology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A review of quantitative modeling of B cell responses to antigenic challenge.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2014
    Review
  17. Modeling the T cell immune response: a fascinating challenge.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vipin NarangSingapore Immunology Network, BMSI, Singapore. Vipin_Narang@immunol.a-star.edu.sg
James Decraene
Shek-Yoon Wong
Bindu S Aiswarya
Andrew R Wasem
Shiang Rong Leong
Alexandre Gouaillard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunological studies frequently analyze individual components (e.g., signaling pathways) of immune systems in a reductionist manner. In contrast, systems immunology aims to give a synthetic understanding of how these components function together as a whole. While immunological research involves in vivo and in vitro experiments, systems immunology research can also be conducted in silico. With an increasing interest in systems-level studies spawned by high-throughput technologies, many immunologists are looking forward to insights provided by computational modeling and simulation. However, modeling and simulation research has mainly been conducted in computational fields, and therefore, little material is available or accessible to immunologists today. This survey is an attempt at bridging the gap between immunologists and systems immunology modeling and simulation. Modeling and simulation refer to building and executing an in silico replica of an immune system. Models are specified within a mathematical or algorithmic framework called formalism and then implemented using software tools. A plethora of modeling formalisms and software tools are reported in the literature for systems immunology. However, it is difficult for a new entrant to the field to know which of these would be suitable for modeling an immunological application at hand. This paper covers three aspects. First, it introduces the field of system immunology emphasizing on the modeling and simulation components. Second, it gives an overview of the principal modeling formalisms, each of which is illustrated with salient applications in immunological research. This overview of formalisms and applications is conducted not only to illustrate their power but also to serve as a reference to assist immunologists in choosing the best formalism for the problem at hand. Third, it lists major software tools, which can be used to practically implement models in these formalisms. Combined, these aspects can help immunologists to start experimenting with in silico models. Finally, future research directions are discussed. Particularly, we identify integrative frameworks to facilitate the coupling of different modeling formalisms and modeling the adaptation properties through evolution of immune systems as the next key research efforts necessary to further develop the multidisciplinary field of systems immunology.

Indexed as

Allergy and ImmunologyComputer SimulationSystems BiologyAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansModels, ImmunologicalSoftware

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.