ArticleDer Nervenarzt2013
[A case of Bleuler's disease? 100 years of dementia praecox or group of schizophrenias].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The debate about renaming schizophrenia: a new name would not resolve the stigma.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 100 years ago Eugen Bleuler published the most significant contribution to psychiatry by conceptualizing the term schizophrenia as a diagnostic entity. In modern diagnostic manuals Bleuler's concept is only reflected in subordinated criteria, i.e. the negative symptoms. On the occasion of the anniversary of Bleuler's essential publication, the present work aims to exemplify the differences in diagnostic concepts and it will be illustrated that Bleuler's intention to establish his so-called basic symptom as a guideline for diagnostics has to be considered as failed from a present day viewpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22528064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.