ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2012
Clinical phenotypes and genetic biomarkers of FTLD.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal MRI of grey matter, white matter, and functional connectivity in cognitively healthy mutation carriers at risk for frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.BMC neurology · 2019Article
- Clinical Trials in a Dish: The Potential of Pluripotent Stem Cells to Develop Therapies for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2016Review
- Neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a review.Dementia & neuropsychologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disorder with a presenile onset. It presents with a spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from behavioural and executive impairment to language disorders and motor dysfunction. New diagnostic criteria identified two main cognitive syndromes: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Regarding bvFTD, new criteria that include the use of biomarkers have been proposed. According to them, bvFTD can be classified in "possible" (clinical features only), "probable" (inclusion of imaging biomarkers) and "definite" (in the presence o f a known causal mutation or at autopsy). Concerning autosomal dominant mutations, microtubule associated protein tau gene mutations have been the first ones identified and are generally associated with early onset bvFTD phenotype. More recently, progranulin gene mutations were recognized in association with familial form of FTLD. In addition, other genes are linked to rare cases of familial FTLD, primarily the newly discovered C9ORF72 hexanucleotide expansion repeats. As regards PPA, new consensus criteria identify three syndromes: primary non-fluent aphasia, semantic variant of PPA and logopenic aphasia, which seems to be associated, in the majority of cases, with underlying Alzheimer's disease pathology. In this review, new criteria, including MRI, cerebrospinal fluid and genetic biomarkers, will be presented and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.