ArticleNeurosurgical review2012
Transcranial superior orbitotomy for the treatment of intraorbital intraconal tumors: surgical technique and long-term results in single institute.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sino-orbital foreign body caused by a slingshot injury in a young boy.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Primary and Secondary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021Article
- Intra-Orbital Meningioma Causing Loss of Vision in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Case Series and Management Considerations.Frontiers in surgery · 2018Article
- Superolateral Orbitotomy for Intraorbital Tumors: Comparison with the Conventional Approach.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2016Article
- Analyses on the misdiagnoses of 25 patients with unilateral optic nerve sheath meningioma.International journal of ophthalmology · 2016Article
- Personalized multidisciplinary approach of orbital apex foreign body: A case report and literature review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, the authors are presenting their experience and the results with the surgical treatment of intraorbital intraconal tumors based on a review of 33 constitutive cases. Our data were evaluated in comparison to other major series, and possible factors that might influence surgical outcome and survival are discussed. Thirty-three patients diagnosed with intraorbital intraconal tumors between 1998 and 2009 were treated by transcranial approach. Of these patients, there were 14 males (42.4 %) and 19 females (57.8 %). The age ranged between 2 and 70 years (mean = 36 ± 16.6 years). The follow-up period ranged between 2 and 13 years (mean = 7.3 ± 3.2 years). The most common presenting symptoms were exophthalmus and decreased visual acuity, which was seen in 21 (63.6 %) and 19 patients (57.6 %), respectively. Total resection was achieved in 23 patients (69.7 %) while subtotal resection was done in ten patients (30.3 %). Cavernoma and optic nerve sheath meningioma were the most common histologic variants, which were found in 11 (33.3 %) and 10 (30.3 %) patients, respectively. In the long-term follow-up, 54.5 % of the patients showed total ophthalmologic improvement, 9.1 % showed partial improvement, 21.2 % demonstrated unchanged ophthalmologic status, and 15.2 % showed worse ophthalmologic outcome. Transcranial approach for the treatment of intraorbital intraconal tumors is an effective approach for the management of these pathologies. The effectiveness is clearly demonstrated by the clinical results and outcomes of these patients' groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.