Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527539›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2012

Reproducibility of a cough and jump stress test for the evaluation of urinary incontinence.

G Horndalsveen Berild, S Kulseng-Hanssen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06731985 (The FAST- Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06731985 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The FAST- Study: The Follow-up After Shorter Tapes Study Effectiveness and Safety of Shorter Trans-obturator Tapes: A Prospective Observational Study From the Norwegian Female Incontinence Registry

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2024 to 2026Enrolled750ConditionsStress Urinary Incontinence, Postsurgical Pain, Follow-Up Studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effectiveness and Safety of Shorter Incontinence Slings.International urogynecology journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G Horndalsveen BerildGynekologene på Kolbotn, Kolbotn, Norway.
S Kulseng-Hanssen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe study seeks to determine whether a urinary cough and jump stress test is reproducible and whether there is a relationship between a stress test and a 24-h pad test and our subjective Stress Incontinence Index.

methodsMulticenter prospective cohort study of women with subjective stress incontinence. Each patient completed a validated Stress and Urge Incontinence Questionnaire and a 24-h pad test and performed two standardized cough and jump stress tests.

resultsAll 108 women were incontinent during both the first and second stress tests. There was a large variation in leakage and the leakage was significantly larger during stress test 2 than during stress test 1 (P < 0.02). Correlations found between the stress test and the 24 hour pad test and between the stress test and the Stress Incontinence Index were poor.

conclusionThe cough and jump stress test is reproducible and able to document stress leakage.

Indexed as

CoughMotor ActivityAdultAgedCohort StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.