Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527480›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2012

Prescribing omissions in elderly patients admitted to a stroke unit: descriptive study using START criteria.

Elisabete Pinto Borges, Manuel Morgado, Ana Filipa Macedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabete Pinto BorgesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal. elisabete.borges@gmail.com
Manuel Morgado
Ana Filipa Macedo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderuse of medication considered beneficial is particularly common in elderly patients. A new Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment (START) has been published to identify potential prescribing omissions.

objectiveTo quantify and characterize potential prescribing omissions of cardiovascular risk management therapy using START criteria.

settingThis study was conducted in the Stroke Unit of the university teaching hospital of Cova da Beira Hospital Centre, Covilhã, located in the Eastern Central Region of Portugal.

methodDuring 6 months, the medical files of all elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) admitted with acute cardiovascular disease were reviewed and the START criteria applied to the information of medication, at admission and at the time of discharge from the hospital Stroke Unit.

main outcome measurePotential prescribing omissions of cardiovascular and endocrine pharmacological therapy were identified and the difference in the potential prescribing omissions between admission and discharge from hospital Stroke Unit was also evaluated.

resultsAt the time of admission to the Stroke Unit, 101 potential prescribing omissions were found in 68.1 % (n = 91) of elderly (average 1.11 omissions per patient), of which 84.2 % (n = 85) were corrected at the time of discharge. In 14 patients, 16 omissions found at admission were not corrected during hospitalization, and in 5 patients 5 new omissions were detected.

conclusionPrescribing omissions of beneficial drugs are highly prevalent in acutely ill admitted to a Stroke Unit. START criteria represent a simple, evidence-based and easy-to-use tool to screen underuse of cardiovascular risk management therapy in elderly patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMedication ErrorsMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPhysiciansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.