ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of cyclosporine in a Tunisian population of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter-Based Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciclosporin in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients.Pharmaceutical research · 2019Trial
- Analysis of the variable factors affecting changes in the blood concentration of cyclosporine before and after transfusion of red blood cell concentrate.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2022Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine in Chinese Pediatric Patients With Acquired Aplastic Anemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2016Review
- Pharmacokinetic tools for the dose adjustment of ciclosporin in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Bayesian approach for the estimation of cyclosporine area under the curve using limited sampling strategies in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2014Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in transplant recipients.The AAPS journal · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTherapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine minimizes the risk of toxicity and acute rejection after transplantation. Areas under the curve (AUCs) rather than trough concentration-based monitoring are recommended. Population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) modeling and Bayesian estimation seem to be the best way to predict cyclosporine disposition and dose requirements to achieve the therapeutic target in an individual patient because of the possibility of predicting cyclosporine AUC using only a few blood samples. Our objectives were to build a PopPk model for cyclosporine in a Tunisian population of HSCT patients and to develop a Bayesian method for the estimation of individual cyclosporine AUC. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe PopPk of cyclosporine was studied using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) in 30 patients (index group) receiving cyclosporine on a twice-daily basis. Ten blood samples were collected after steady-state morning cyclosporine dose. Bayesian estimation of individual AUC was made on the basis of three blood concentration measurements in an independent group of 30 patients (test group).
resultsA two-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time provided the best fitting. The population mean estimate and interindividual variability from the final model for CL, Ka, Tlag, V1, V2, and Q were 25.4 L/h (CV = 38.72 %), 0.214 h(-1)(CV = 28.5 %), 0.382 h, 10.9 L (85.73 %), 496 L, and 5 L/h, respectively. Covariates had no discernible effects on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in our population. Bayesian estimation provided an accurate estimation of AUC, although a bias was observed leading to slight underprediction of AUC (bias -1.03 %). A very satisfactory precision was observed (RMSE 12.07 %).
conclusionWe report a PopPK model for cyclosporine in Tunisian HSCT patients. Bayesian estimation using only three concentrations provides good prediction of cyclosporine exposure. These tools allow us to routinely estimate cyclosporine AUC in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22527344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.