Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527270›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2012

Use of comparative genomics to develop EST-SSRs for red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus).

Christopher M Hollenbeck, David S Portnoy, John R Gold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher M HollenbeckDepartment of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Center for Biosystematics and Biodiversity, Texas A&M University, TAMU 2258, College Station, TX 77843-2258, USA. chollenbeck07@tamu.edu
David S Portnoy
John R Gold

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellites physically linked to expressed sequence tags (EST-SSRs) are an important resource for linkage mapping and comparative genomics, and data mining in publicly available EST databases is a common strategy for EST-SSR discovery. At present, many species lack species-specific EST sequence data needed for the efficient characterization of EST-SSRs. This paper describes the discovery and development of EST-SSRs for red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), an estuarine-dependent sciaenid species of economic importance in the USA and elsewhere, using a phylogenetically informed, comparative genomics approach to primer design. The approach entailed comparing existing genomic resources from species closely allied phylogenetically to red drum, with resources from more distantly related outgroup species. By taking into account the degree to which flanking regions are conserved across taxa, the efficiency of PCR primer design was increased greatly. The amplification success rate for primers designed for red drum was 100 % when using EST libraries from confamilial species and 92 % when using an EST library from a species in the same suborder. The primers developed also amplified EST-SSRs in a wide range of perciform fishes, suggesting potential use in comparative genomics. This study demonstrates that EST-SSRs can be efficiently developed for an organism when limited species-specific data are available by exploiting genomic resources from well-studied species, even those at extended phylogenetic distances.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingComparative Genomic HybridizationGenetic LinkageGenomeMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence DataOceans and SeasPerchesSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.