Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527245›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2012

Targeted immunotherapy of cancer with CAR T cells: achievements and challenges.

Grazyna Lipowska-Bhalla, David E Gilham, Robert E Hawkins, Dominic G Rothwell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Novel insights into the role of aptamers in the fight against cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grazyna Lipowska-BhallaClinical and Experimental Immunotherapy Group, School of Cancer and Enabling Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
David E Gilham
Robert E Hawkins
Dominic G Rothwell
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBCancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing T cells is a relatively new but promising approach in the field of cancer immunotherapy. This therapeutic strategy is based on the genetic reprogramming of T cells with an artificial immune receptor that redirects them against targets on malignant cells and enables their destruction by exerting T cell effector functions. There has been an explosion of interest in the use of CAR T cells as an immunotherapy for cancer. In the pre-clinical setting, there has been a considerable focus upon optimizing the structural and signaling potency of the CAR while advances in bio-processing technology now mean that the clinical testing of these gene-modified T cells has become a reality. This review will summarize the concept of CAR-based immunotherapy and recent clinical trial activity and will further discuss some of the likely future challenges facing CAR-modified T cell therapies.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion ProteinsT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22527245
PMCPMC11028843
OpenAlexW2118902000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.