Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527184›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2012

Long-term follow up of patients who were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology: final report from the CCOG0301 study.

Yasuhiro Kodera, Seiji Ito, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Norifumi Ohashi, Chie Tanaka, Daisuke Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kojima, Takanori Matsui, Ken Kondo, Michitaka Fujiwara

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 therapy for patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer: short-term outcomes of a multicenter, phase II study (OGSG1902).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Trial
  7. Docetaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in unresectable gastric cancer without measurable lesions: a randomized phase II trial (HERBIS-3).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer and positive peritoneal cytology who underwent upfront surgery.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Asian consensus on normothermic intraperitoneal and systemic treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Practical management of oligometastatic gastric cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Surgery II, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan. ykodera@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Seiji Ito
Yoshinari Mochizuki
Norifumi Ohashi
Chie Tanaka
Daisuke Kobayashi
Hiroshi Kojima
Takanori Matsui
Ken Kondo
Michitaka Fujiwara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn gastric cancer patients who have positive results for peritoneal lavage cytology the disease is defined as CY1, and classified as stage IV, and this population has generally suffered a dismal outcome. For this population, we had conducted a phase II trial, with the 2-year survival rate as the primary endpoint, to test the strategy of D2 dissection followed by chemotherapy with single-agent S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium). Forty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 47 were found to have been eligible for analysis. The 2-year survival rate of 46 % exceeded our expectations.

methodsFurther follow up was conducted to confirm whether radical surgery could be recommended for the CY1 population.

resultsThe 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 26 and 21 %, respectively.

conclusionsGastrectomy with curative intent could be considered for patients with CY1 disease provided they are scheduled to receive effective postoperative chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansOxonic AcidPeritoneal CavityPeritoneal LavageStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateTegafurAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.