Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527098›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2012

Oncogene amplification in male breast cancer: analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Robert Kornegoor, Cathy B Moelans, Anoek H J Verschuur-Maes, Marieke C H Hogenes, Peter C de Bruin, Joost J Oudejans, Luigi Marchionni, Paul J van Diest

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Elastosis in ERα-positive male breast cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TRAF4 binds to the juxtamembrane region of EGFR directly and promotes kinase activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic models in male breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chromosome 17 copy number changes in male breast cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert KornegoorDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cathy B Moelans
Anoek H J Verschuur-Maes
Marieke C H Hogenes
Peter C de Bruin
Joost J Oudejans
Luigi Marchionni
Paul J van Diest
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLHeidelberg University · DEJohns Hopkins University · USSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene amplification is an important mechanism for oncogene activation, a crucial step in carcinogenesis. Compared to female breast cancer, little is known on the genetic makeup of male breast cancer, because large series are lacking. Copy number changes of 21 breast cancer related genes were studied in 110 male breast cancers using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. A ratio of >1.3 was regarded indicative for gene copy number gain and a ratio >2.0 for gene amplification. Data were correlated with clinicopathological features, prognosis and 17 genes were compared with a group of female breast cancers. Gene copy number gain of CCND1, TRAF4, CDC6 and MTDH was seen in >40 % of the male breast cancer cases, with also frequent amplification. The number of genes with copy number gain and several single genes were associated with high grade, but only CCND1 amplification was an independent predictor of adverse survival in Cox regression (p = 0.015; hazard ratio 3.0). In unsupervised hierarchical clustering a distinctive group of male breast cancer with poor prognosis (p = 0.009; hazard ratio 3.4) was identified, characterized by frequent CCND1, MTDH, CDC6, ADAM9, TRAF4 and MYC copy number gain. Compared to female breast cancers, EGFR (p = 0.005) and CCND1 (p = 0.041) copy number gain was more often seen in male breast cancer, while copy number gain of EMSY (p = 0.004) and CPD (p = 0.001) and amplification in general was less frequent. In conclusion, several female breast cancer genes also seem to be important in male breast carcinogenesis. However, there are also clear differences in copy number changes between male and female breast cancers, pointing toward differences in carcinogenesis between male and female breast cancer and emphasizing the importance of identifying biomarkers and therapeutic agents based on research in male breast cancer. In addition CCND1 amplification seems to be an independent prognosticator in male breast cancer.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene AmplificationOncogenesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast Neoplasms, MaleCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin D1Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCCND1 protein, humanCDC6 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin D1ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesMembrane ProteinsMTDH protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsTNF Receptor-Associated Factor 4TRAF4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22527098
PMCPMC3413821
OpenAlexW2112403300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.