Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22527062›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2012

In-line filtration reduces severe complications and length of stay on pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Thomas Jack, Martin Boehne, Bernadette E Brent, Ludwig Hoy, Harald Köditz, Armin Wessel, Michael Sasse

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00209768 phase4completednot on this map

Randomised, Prospective Study of the Use of In-Line Filtration on the Reduction of Complication Rate in Critically Ill Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorHannover Medical SchoolRan2005 to 2008Enrolled821ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsFilter: NOE96E, ELD96E, NLF1E, TNA1E
NCT05537389 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Central Lines Filtration in Newborns: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Turin, ItalyRan2023 to 2026Enrolled736ConditionsNewborn Complication, Catheter ComplicationsArmsIn-line filter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Paediatric parenteral nutrition: current issues.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  20. Incidence and Causes of Infusion Alarms in a Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Pilot Study.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas JackDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Martin Boehne
Bernadette E Brent
Ludwig Hoy
Harald Köditz
Armin Wessel
Michael Sasse
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParticulate contamination due to infusion therapy carries a potential health risk for intensive care patients.

methodsThis single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of filtration of intravenous fluids on the reduction of complications in critically ill children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A total of 807 subjects were randomly assigned to either a control (n = 406) or filter group (n = 401), with the latter receiving in-line filtration. The primary endpoint was reduction in the rate of overall complications, which included the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, organ failure (circulation, lung, liver, kidney) and thrombosis. Secondary objectives were a reduction in the length of stay on the PICU and overall hospital stay. Duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality were also analyzed.

findingsAnalysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the overall complication rate (n = 166 [40.9 %] vs. n = 124 [30.9 %]; P = 0.003) for the filter group. In particular, the incidence of SIRS was significantly lower (n = 123 [30.3 %] vs. n = 90 [22.4 %]; P = 0.01). Moreover the length of stay on PICU (3.89 [95 % confidence interval 2.97-4.82] vs. 2.98 [2.33-3.64]; P = 0.025) and duration of mechanical ventilation (14.0 [5.6-22.4] vs. 11.0 [7.1-14.9] h; P = 0.028) were significantly reduced.

conclusionIn-line filtration is able to avert severe complications in critically ill patients. The overall complication rate during the PICU stay among the filter group was significantly reduced. In-line filtration was effective in reducing the occurrence of SIRS. We therefore conclude that in-line filtration improves the safety of intensive care therapy and represents a preventive strategy that results in a significant reduction of the length of stay in the PICU and duration of mechanical ventilation (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00209768).

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, PediatricLength of StayChildCritical IllnessDrug ContaminationFemaleFiltrationGermanyHumansInfusion PumpsMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22527062
PMCPMC3351606
OpenAlexW2157810116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.