ArticleThe Journal of physiology2012
Two types of extracellular action potentials recorded with narrow-tipped pipettes in skeletal muscle of frog, Rana temporaria.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sub-cellular Electrical Heterogeneity Revealed by Loose Patch Recording Reflects Differential Localization of Sarcolemmal Ion Channels in Intact Rat Hearts.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- The influence of 9-anthracene carbonic acid on the contractile and electric parameters of the frog (Rana temporaria) skeletal muscle fibers.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two types of muscle fibre action potentials (APs) were recorded using narrow-tipped extracellular pipettes in isolated sartorius muscles of frog, Rana temporaria. The waveform of type 1 responses (T1 AP, 75% of recordings) was biphasic, 'positive–negative.' The type 2 signals were tri-phasic, 'positive–negative–positive' (T2 AP, 18%). The type of AP was preserved for up to 1 h of collecting data from the given site on the muscle fibre. However, a re-positioning of the recording pipette by a few micrometres along the axis of the studied fibre resulted in a change of the type of AP in 73% of such attempts. In experiments with detubulated muscles, only T1 APs were observed. In experiments using 10 μmol l(−1) Ba2+ filled pipettes, the characteristics of the T1 waveform did not change, but the amplitude of the third phase of T2 APs increased progressively during continuous recording. In experiments with 100 μmol l(−1) Ba2+ filled pipettes, a decline and eventual inversion of the third phase of the T2 signal was observed. Amplitude and duration of the inverted third phase of T2 APs increased progressively with frequency of muscle stimulation. These results can be explained by suggesting that currents generated within the t-tubular system of muscle fibre form the third phase of extracellularly recorded APs. Measurement and analysis of T2 APs present a unique approach in determining the mechanisms controlling accumulation of t-tubular K+ and the role of these mechanisms in regulation of muscle contractility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.