Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22526883›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2012

Human responses to bright light of different durations.

Anne-Marie Chang, Nayantara Santhi, Melissa St Hilaire, Claude Gronfier, Dayna S Bradstreet, Jeanne F Duffy, Steven W Lockley, Richard E Kronauer, Charles A Czeisler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Phase-shifting response to light in older adults.The Journal of physiology · 2014
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne-Marie ChangDivision of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Suite 438, Boston, MA 02115, USA. amchang@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Nayantara Santhi
Melissa St Hilaire
Claude Gronfier
Dayna S Bradstreet
Jeanne F Duffy
Steven W Lockley
Richard E Kronauer
Charles A Czeisler

Funding

HARVARD CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER (UL1)UL1RR025758 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2008 to 2011
$91.4M
Zoledronic Acid in Treatment of Osteoporosis in PostmenoM01RR002635 · NCRR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GARBER, JUDY E. · 1985 to 2008
$48.4M
TREATMENT OF CIRCADIAN SLEEP DISORDERS WITH BRIGHT LIGHTR01MH045130 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LOCKLEY, STEVEN W · 1989 to 2010
$4.9M
Adaptation of Circadian Responses to Light TreatmentR01HL077453 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DUFFY, JEANNE F · 2004 to 2010
$2.6M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR002635NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-02635NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025758NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077453NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL077453NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH045130NIMH NIH HHS R01MH045130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light exposure in the early night induces phase delays of the circadian rhythm in melatonin in humans. Previous studies have investigated the effect of timing, intensity, wavelength, history and pattern of light stimuli on the human circadian timing system. We present results from a study of the duration–response relationship to phase-delaying bright light. Thirty-nine young healthy participants (16 female; 22.18±3.62 years) completed a 9-day inpatient study. Following three baseline days, participants underwent an initial circadian phase assessment procedure in dim light (<3 lux), and were then randomized for exposure to a bright light pulse (∼10,000 lux) of 0.2 h, 1.0 h, 2.5 h or 4.0 h duration during a 4.5 h controlled-posture episode centred in a 16 h wake episode. After another 8 h sleep episode, participants completed a second circadian phase assessment. Phase shifts were calculated from the difference in the clock time of the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) between the initial and final phase assessments. Exposure to varying durations of bright light reset the circadian pacemaker in a dose-dependent, non-linear manner. Per minute of exposure, the 0.2 h duration was over 5 times more effective at phase delaying the circadian pacemaker (1.07±0.36 h) as compared with the 4.0 h duration (2.65±0.24 h). Acute melatonin suppression and subjective sleepiness also had a dose-dependent response to light exposure duration. These results provide strong evidence for a non-linear resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker to light duration.

Indexed as

LightAdolescentAdultCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMelatoninSleepTime FactorsYoung AdultMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID22526883
PMCPMC3406393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.