ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2012
Comparative study of the interaction of fullerenol nanoparticles with eukaryotic and bacterial model membranes using solid-state NMR and FTIR spectroscopy.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) on Thermophilic Bacteria: Antibacterial, Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Investigations.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Monitoring of Low-Intensity Exposures via Luminescent Bioassays of Different Complexity: Cells, Enzyme Reactions, and Fluorescent Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- On mechanism of antioxidant effect of fullerenols.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2017Article
- C60 fullerene localization and membrane interactions in RAW 264.7 immortalized mouse macrophages.Nanoscale · 2016Article
- Small cationic antimicrobial peptides delocalize peripheral membrane proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Native fullerene is notoriously insoluble in water and forms aggregates toxic to cell membranes, thus limiting its use in nanomedicine. In contrast, water-soluble fullerenol is compatible with biological systems and shows low in vivo toxicity on human cell lines. The interaction mechanism between these hydrophilic nanoparticles and biological membranes is however not well understood. Therefore, in this work, the effect of fullerenol on model eukaryotic and bacterial membranes was investigated using (31)P- and (2)H solid-state NMR as well as FTIR spectroscopy. DPPC/cholesterol and DPPC/DPPG bilayers were used to mimic eukaryotic and bacterial cell membranes, respectively. Our results show low affinity of fullerenol for DPPC/cholesterol bilayers but a clear interaction with model bacterial membranes. A preferential affinity of fullerenol for the anionic phospholipids DPPG in DPPC/DPPG membranes is also observed. Our data suggest that fullerenol remains at the water/bilayer interface of eukaryote-like membranes. They also indicate that the presence of a polar group such as DPPG's hydroxyl moiety at the bilayer surface plays a key role in the interaction of fullerenol with membranes. Hydrogen bonding of fullerenol nanoparticles with DPPGs' OH groups is most likely responsible for inducing lipid segregation in the lipid bilayer. Moreover, the location of the nanoparticles in the polar region of DPPG-rich regions appears to disturb the acyl chain packing and increase the membrane fluidity. The preferential interaction of fullerenol with lipids mostly found in bacterial membranes is of great interest for the design of new antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.