ArticlePediatric radiology2012
Deep sedation during pneumatic reduction of intussusception.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparison of the success rate of pneumatic reduction in intussusception between general anesthesia and deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Trial
- External manual reduction of paediatric idiopathic ileocolic intussusception with US assistance: a new, standardised, effective and safe manoeuvre.Pediatric radiology · 2012Trial
- European society of paediatric radiology abdominal task force procedural recommendations for intussusception reduction: what's the evidence?Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Opioid Administration and Reduction of Pediatric Ileocolic Intussusception.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Effects of General Anesthesia on the Success Rate of Pneumatic Reduction in the Treatment of Intussusception.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Sedation and Analgesia for Reduction of Pediatric Ileocolic Intussusception.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Current diagnosis and image-guided reduction for intussusception in children.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023Article
- Sedative reduction method for children with intussusception.Medicine · 2020Article
- The pediatric gastrointestinal tract: ultrasound findings in acute diseases.Journal of ultrasound · 2019Review
- Fluoroscopy-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in infancy: role of pharmacological premedication.La Radiologia medica · 2015Article
- Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results.Pediatric radiology · 2015Article
- Radiation dose in pneumatic reduction of ileo-colic intussusceptions--results from a single-institution study.Pediatric radiology · 2015Article
- Ketamine sedation during air enema reduction of pediatric intussusception: Assessing safety and intraluminal pressure.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
- Non-Operative Reduction of Childhood Intussusception in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Emerging Challenges.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPneumatic reduction of intussusception under fluoroscopic guidance is a routine procedure. The unsedated child may resist the procedure, which may lengthen its duration and increase the radiation dose. We use deep sedation during the procedure to overcome these difficulties.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to summarize our experience with deep sedation during fluoroscopic reduction of intussusception and assess the added value and complication rate of deep sedation. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll children with intussusception who underwent pneumatic reduction in our hospital between January 2004 and June 2011 were included in this retrospective study. Anesthetists sedated the children using propofol. The fluoroscopic studies, ultrasound (US) studies and the childrens' charts were reviewed.
resultsOne hundred thirty-one attempted reductions were performed in 119 children, of which 121 (92%) were successful and 10 (8%) failed. Two perforations (1.5%) occurred during attempted reduction. Average fluoroscopic time was 1.5 minutes. No complication to sedation was recorded.
conclusionsDeep sedation with propofol did not add any complication to the pneumatic reduction. The fluoroscopic time was short. The success rate of reduction was high,raising the possibility that sedation is beneficial, possibly by smooth muscle relaxation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22526283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.