ArticleJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2012
Developing your career in an age of team science.
Article in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Team science in interdisciplinary health professions education research: a multi-institutional case study.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- Is team science valued in the academic promotions process? A mixed-methods case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Team science: A syllabus for success on big projects.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Visioning the Future of Gerontological Digital Social Work.Journal of gerontological social work · 2020Review
- Impact factor impacts on early-career scientist careers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Development of a game-based learning tool for applied team science communication in a virtual clinical trial.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Career Development of Young Physician-Scientists in the Cardiovascular Sciences: Perspective and Advice From the Early Career Committee of the Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, and Resuscitation Council of the American Heart Association.Circulation research · 2018Article
- Article
- Future directions for postdoctoral training in cancer prevention: insights from a panel of experts.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014Article
- Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2012Article
- Playing in the Sandbox: Considerations When Leading or Participating on a Multidisciplinary Research Team.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Academic institutions and researchers are becoming increasingly involved in translational research to spur innovation in addressing many complex biomedical and societal problems and in response to the focus of the National Institutes of Health and other funders. One approach to translational research is to develop interdisciplinary research teams. By bringing together collaborators with diverse research backgrounds and perspectives, these teams seek to blend their science and the workings of the scientists to push beyond the limits of current research.While team science promises individual and team benefits in creating and implementing innovations, its increased complexity poses challenges. In particular, because academic career advancement commonly focuses on individual achievement, team science might differentially impact early stage researchers. The need to be recognized for individual accomplishments to move forward in an academic career may give rise to research team conflicts. Raising awareness to career-related aspects of team science will help individuals (particularly trainees and junior faculty) take steps to align their excitement and participation with the success of both the team and their personal career advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.