ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2012
Visual categorisation of the arch index: a simplified measure of foot posture in older people.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Foot shape assessment techniques for orthotic and footwear applications: a methodological literature review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Pooled it
- Smartphone Photogrammetry as a Tool for Pes Planus Assessment: Reliability and Agreement with Radiographic Measurements.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Footprint to prediction: low-cost, three-class foot arch screening using a Harris mat.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based automated angle measurement for flatfoot diagnosis in weight-bearing lateral radiographs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Muscle strength and foot pressure vary depending on the type of foot pain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Radiological Measurements in the Evaluation and Differentiation of Flatfoot: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pes Planus Foot among the First and Second Year Medical Students of a Medical College: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2021Article
- Clinical measures of foot posture and ankle joint dorsiflexion do not differ in adults with and without plantar heel pain.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Backpacks Effect on Foot Posture in Schoolchildren with a Neutral Foot Posture: A Three-Year Prospective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- A Deep-Learning Approach for Foot-Type Classification Using Heterogeneous Pressure Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Locomotion Variations of Arch Index and Interlimb Symmetry in Shod and Barefoot Populations.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2020Article
- Correlates and predictors of paediatric leg pain: a case-control study.Rheumatology international · 2018Article
- Relationships Between Self-awareness and Clinical Diagnostic Findings of Abnormal Foot Arch Height in Koreans.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2017Article
- Flat Foot in a Random Population and its Impact on Quality of Life and Functionality.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
- Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2015Article
- Lower limb biomechanical characteristics of patients with neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: the diabetes foot ulcer study protocol.BMC endocrine disorders · 2015Article
- Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older.Journal of epidemiology · 2015Article
- The pictogram of the pes planus from the first century AD.International orthopaedics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoot posture is considered to be an important component of musculoskeletal assessment in clinical practice and research. However, many measurement approaches are not suitable for routine use as they are time-consuming or require specialised equipment and/or clinical expertise. The objective of this study was therefore to develop and evaluate a simple visual tool for foot posture assessment based on the Arch Index (AI) that could be used in clinical and research settings.
methodsFully weightbearing footprints from 602 people aged 62 to 96 years were obtained using a carbon paper imprint material, and cut-off AI scores dividing participants into three categories (high, normal and low) were determined using the central limit theorem (i.e. normal = +/- 1 standard deviation from the mean). A visual tool was then created using representative examples for the boundaries of each category. Two examiners were then asked to use the tool to independently grade the footprints of 60 participants (20 for each of the three categories, randomly presented), and then repeat the process two weeks later. Inter- and intra-tester reliability was determined using Spearman's rho, percentage agreement and weighted kappa statistics. The validity of the examiner's assessments was evaluated by comparing their categorisations to the actual AI score using Spearman's rho and analysis of variance (ANOVA), and to the actual AI category using percentage agreement, Spearman's rho and weighted kappa.
resultsInter- and intra-tester reliability of the examiners was almost perfect (percentage agreement = 93 to 97%; Spearman's rho = 0.91 to 0.95, and weighted kappas = 0.85 to 0.93). Examiner's scores were strongly correlated with actual AI values (Spearman's rho = 0.91 to 0.94 and significant differences between all categories with ANOVA; p < 0.001) and AI categories (percentage agreement = 95 to 98%; Spearman's rho = 0.89 to 0.94, and weighted kappas = 0.87 to 0.94). There was a slight tendency for examiners to categorise participants as having higher arches than their AI scores indicated.
conclusionsFoot posture can be quickly and reliably categorised as high, normal or low in older people using a simplified visual categorisation tool based on the AI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.