Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22524245›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

F2C2: a fast tool for the computation of flux coupling in genome-scale metabolic networks.

Abdelhalim Larhlimi, Laszlo David, Joachim Selbig, Alexander Bockmayr

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. On the representativeness and stability of a set of EFMs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  7. Relative flux trade-offs and optimization of metabolic network functionalities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A mechanism-aware and multiomic machine-learning pipeline characterizes yeast cell growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Network reduction methods for genome-scale metabolic models.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantitative flux coupling analysis.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Evolutionary design principles in metabolism.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdelhalim LarhlimiDepartment of Bioinformatics, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str, 24-25, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany. Larhlimi@mpimp-golm.mpg.de
Laszlo David
Joachim Selbig
Alexander Bockmayr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlux coupling analysis (FCA) has become a useful tool in the constraint-based analysis of genome-scale metabolic networks. FCA allows detecting dependencies between reaction fluxes of metabolic networks at steady-state. On the one hand, this can help in the curation of reconstructed metabolic networks by verifying whether the coupling between reactions is in agreement with the experimental findings. On the other hand, FCA can aid in defining intervention strategies to knock out target reactions.

resultsWe present a new method F2C2 for FCA, which is orders of magnitude faster than previous approaches. As a consequence, FCA of genome-scale metabolic networks can now be performed in a routine manner.

conclusionsWe propose F2C2 as a fast tool for the computation of flux coupling in genome-scale metabolic networks. F2C2 is freely available for non-commercial use at https://sourceforge.net/projects/f2c2/files/.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareComputational BiologyGenomeMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID22524245
PMCPMC3515416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.