Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22524225›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2012

Computational models of protein kinematics and dynamics: beyond simulation.

Bryant Gipson, David Hsu, Lydia E Kavraki, Jean-Claude Latombe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Native State of Complement Protein C3d Analysed via Hydrogen Exchange and Conformational Sampling.International journal of computational biology and drug design · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Maintaining and Enhancing Diversity of Sampled Protein Conformations in Robotics-Inspired Methods.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Crystallographic model validation: from diagnosis to healing.Current opinion in structural biology · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryant GipsonComputer Science Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA. bryant.gipson@rice.edu
David Hsu
Lydia E Kavraki
Jean-Claude Latombe

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physics-based simulation represents a powerful method for investigating the time-varying behavior of dynamic protein systems at high spatial and temporal resolution. Such simulations, however, can be prohibitively difficult or lengthy for large proteins or when probing the lower-resolution, long-timescale behaviors of proteins generally. Importantly, not all questions about a protein system require full space and time resolution to produce an informative answer. For instance, by avoiding the simulation of uncorrelated, high-frequency atomic movements, a larger, domain-level picture of protein dynamics can be revealed. The purpose of this review is to highlight the growing body of complementary work that goes beyond simulation. In particular, this review focuses on methods that address kinematics and dynamics, as well as those that address larger organizational questions and can quickly yield useful information about the long-timescale behavior of a protein.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22524225
PMCPMC4866812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.