Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22524217›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2012

Probing embryonic stem cell autocrine and paracrine signaling using microfluidics.

Laralynne Przybyla, Joel Voldman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The adaptation of bovine embryonic stem cells to the changes of feeder layers.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stem cells and development · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laralynne PrzybylaDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Joel Voldman

Funding

Microscale control of stem cell signaling using cell patterning and perfusionR01EB007278 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VOLDMAN, JOEL · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB007278NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although stem cell fate is traditionally manipulated by exogenously altering the cells' extracellular signaling environment, the endogenous autocrine and paracrine signals produced by the cells also contribute to their two essential processes: self-renewal and differentiation. Autocrine and/or paracrine signals are fundamental to both embryonic stem cell self-renewal and early embryonic development, but the nature and contributions of these signals are often difficult to fully define using conventional methods. Microfluidic techniques have been used to explore the effects of cell-secreted signals by controlling cell organization or by providing precise control over the spatial and temporal cellular microenvironment. Here we review how such techniques have begun to be adapted for use with embryonic stem cells, and we illustrate how many remaining questions in embryonic stem cell biology could be addressed using microfluidic technologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesParacrine CommunicationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID22524217
PMCPMC4030416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.