Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22523625›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2012

Cut-off value of D-dimer for prediction of deep venous thrombosis before treatment in ovarian cancer.

Ryuji Kawaguchi, Naoto Furukawa, Hiroshi Kobayashi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Incidence of and risk factors for preoperative deep venous thrombosis in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryuji KawaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Naoto Furukawa
Hiroshi Kobayashi
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of the present study was to elucidate the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) before treatment in ovarian cancer and the appropriate cut-off value of D-dimer (DD) for the diagnosis of DVT.

methodsBetween July 2007 and October 2008, eighty seven patients with presumed ovarian cancer (final diagnosis: ovarian cancer, n=59; borderline malignancy, n=28) were enrolled. Measurement of DD levels and subsequent venous ultrasonography were performed before treatment.

resultsThe mean DD level was 4.1 µg/mL. Subsequent venous ultrasonography revealed DVT in 14 of 87 (16.1%) patients (ovarian cancer, 12 cases; borderline malignancy, 2 cases). None were found to have developed DVT if they had a DD level of <1.5 µg/mL. If 1.5 µg/mL was used as a cut-off value for DD levels to diagnose DVT, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 61.6%, 33.3%, and 100%. There was noclinical onset of postoperative pulmonary thromboembolism.

conclusionOur data suggest that presumed ovarian cancer patients with at least more than 1.5 µg/mL should be examined using venous ultrasonogaphy to detect DVT.

Indexed as

D-dimerOvarian neoplasmsVenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID22523625
PMCPMC3325356
OpenAlexW2148148680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.