Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22523608›Full record

ArticleWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Data mining and knowledge discovery2011

The use of classification trees for bioinformatics.

Xiang Chen, Minghui Wang, Heping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 228 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiang ChenYale University in China.
Minghui Wang
Heping Zhang

Funding

Statistical Methods in Genetic Studies of Substance UseR01DA016750 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2004 to 2016
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification trees are non-parametric statistical learning methods that incorporate feature selection and interactions, possess intuitive interpretability, are efficient, and have high prediction accuracy when used in ensembles. This paper provides a brief introduction to the classification tree-based methods, a review of the recent developments, and a survey of the applications in bioinformatics and statistical genetics.

Identifiers

PMID22523608
PMCPMC3329156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.