Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22523533›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A cortical attractor network with Martinotti cells driven by facilitating synapses.

Pradeep Krishnamurthy, Gilad Silberberg, Anders Lansner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of Somatostatin-Positive Cortical Interneurons in the Generation of Sleep Slow Waves.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Contributions of diverse excitatory and inhibitory neurons to recurrent network activity in cerebral cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Target-cell-specific short-term plasticity in local circuits.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  13. The logic of inhibitory connectivity in the neocortex.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pradeep KrishnamurthyDepartment of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gilad Silberberg
Anders Lansner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The population of pyramidal cells significantly outnumbers the inhibitory interneurons in the neocortex, while at the same time the diversity of interneuron types is much more pronounced. One acknowledged key role of inhibition is to control the rate and patterning of pyramidal cell firing via negative feedback, but most likely the diversity of inhibitory pathways is matched by a corresponding diversity of functional roles. An important distinguishing feature of cortical interneurons is the variability of the short-term plasticity properties of synapses received from pyramidal cells. The Martinotti cell type has recently come under scrutiny due to the distinctly facilitating nature of the synapses they receive from pyramidal cells. This distinguishes these neurons from basket cells and other inhibitory interneurons typically targeted by depressing synapses. A key aspect of the work reported here has been to pinpoint the role of this variability. We first set out to reproduce quantitatively based on in vitro data the di-synaptic inhibitory microcircuit connecting two pyramidal cells via one or a few Martinotti cells. In a second step, we embedded this microcircuit in a previously developed attractor memory network model of neocortical layers 2/3. This model network demonstrated that basket cells with their characteristic depressing synapses are the first to discharge when the network enters an attractor state and that Martinotti cells respond with a delay, thereby shifting the excitation-inhibition balance and acting to terminate the attractor state. A parameter sensitivity analysis suggested that Martinotti cells might, in fact, play a dominant role in setting the attractor dwell time and thus cortical speed of processing, with cellular adaptation and synaptic depression having a less prominent role than previously thought.

Indexed as

InterneuronsModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerPyramidal CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID22523533
PMCPMC3327695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.