Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22523271›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2012

Decreased cure and increased recurrence rates for Clostridium difficile infection caused by the epidemic C. difficile BI strain.

Laurica A Petrella, Susan P Sambol, Adam Cheknis, Kristin Nagaro, Yin Kean, Pamela S Sears, Farah Babakhani, Stuart Johnson, Dale N Gerding

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: EXTEND study subgroup analyses.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Relapse versus reinfection: recurrent Clostridium difficile infection following treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Reliable delineation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Clostridioides difficile Is Associated With Lower Rates of Initial Cure and Sustained Clinical Response.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  14. The Strain and the Clinical Outcome ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  15. Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rates and Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Which is the Preferred Regimen for Non-SevereInfection & chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurica A PetrellaEdward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA. laurica.petrella@va.gov
Susan P Sambol
Adam Cheknis
Kristin Nagaro
Yin Kean
Pamela S Sears
Farah Babakhani
Stuart Johnson
Dale N Gerding

Funding

New Treatment for C. difficile-Associated DiarrheaR44AI063692 · NIAID · OPTIMER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI BABAKHANI, FARAH · 2007 to 2009
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI063692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn epidemic strain of Clostridium difficile designated by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) as group BI has caused multiple outbreaks of severe C. difficile infection (CDI). The treatment response of patients infected with this strain is uncertain.

methodsClostridium difficile isolates were collected from 2 phase 3 clinical trials comparing fidaxomicin to vancomycin and typed using REA. Clinical cure and recurrence outcomes were analyzed by strain type of the infecting organism, BI and non-BI, using both univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsFrom 999 patients, 719 isolates were available for typing (356 fidaxomicin treated and 363 vancomycin treated). BI was the most common REA group (34% of isolates). Patients infected with BI had lower cure rates (86.6%; 214 of 247) than those infected with non-BI strains (94.3%; 445 of 472) (P < .001). The cure rate difference between the BI and non-BI patients was significant for both vancomycin (P = .02) and fidaxomicin (P = .007). BI patients had a recurrence rate of 27.4% (51 of 186), compared with a recurrence rate of 16.6% (66 of 397) in non-BI patients (P = .002). By multivariate analysis, BI infection was statistically significant as a risk factor for reduced cure (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], .27-.85; P = .030) and for increased recurrence (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.45; P = .046).

conclusionsThe clinical cure rate of patients infected with the epidemic BI C. difficile strain is lower than the cure rate of those infected with non-BI strains whether treated with fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Similarly, the CDI recurrence rate is increased in patients with the BI strain compared with patients with other C. difficile strains.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFidaxomicinHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular TypingPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthProhibitinsAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicinPHB2 protein, humanProhibitinsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22523271
PMCPMC3491778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.