Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22521905›Full record

ArticleHearing research2013

Comparison and contrast of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus.

N F Manzoor, Y Gao, F Licari, J A Kaltenbach

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DoesLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N F ManzoorDepartment of Neurosciences, The Cleveland Clinic, NE-63, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Y Gao
F Licari
J A Kaltenbach
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Central auditory plasticity as a basis of tinnitusR01DC009097 · NIDCD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI KALTENBACH, JAMES A · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009097NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of hyperactivity in the central auditory system is one of the major physiological hallmarks of animal models of noise-induced tinnitus. Although hyperactivity occurs at various levels of the auditory system, it is not clear to what extent hyperactivity originating in one nucleus contributes to hyperactivity at higher levels of the auditory system. In this study we compared the time courses and tonotopic distribution patterns of hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) and inferior colliculus (IC). A model of acquisition of hyperactivity in the IC by passive relay from the DCN would predict that the two nuclei show similar time courses and tonotopic profiles of hyperactivity. A model of acquisition of hyperactivity in the IC by compensatory plasticity mechanisms would predict that the IC and DCN would show differences in these features, since each adjusts to changes of spontaneous activity of opposite polarity. To test the role of these two mechanisms, animals were exposed to an intense hyperactivity-inducing tone (10 kHz, 115 dB SPL, 4 h) then studied electrophysiologically at three different post-exposure recovery times (from 1 to 6 weeks after exposure). For each time frame, multiunit spontaneous activity was mapped as a function of location along the tonotopic gradient in the DCN and IC. Comparison of activity profiles from the two nuclei showed a similar progression toward increased activity over time and culminated in the development of a central peak of hyperactivity at a similar tonotopic location. These similarities suggest that the shape of the activity profile is determined primarily by passive relay from the cochlear nucleus. However, the absolute levels of activity were generally much lower in the IC than in the DCN, suggesting that the magnitude of hyperactivity is greatly attenuated by inhibition.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochlear NucleusCricetinaeDisease Models, AnimalElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHearing Loss, Noise-InducedInferior ColliculiMesocricetusNeuronal PlasticityNoiseTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID22521905
PMCPMC3538909
OpenAlexW1984890952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.