Trial reportPsychiatry research2012
Predictors of antipsychotic dose changes in the CATIE schizophrenia trial.
Trial report in Psychiatry research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does a history of suicide attempt predict higher antipsychotic dosage in schizophrenia?Psychopharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) was used with the objective of evaluating factors associated with antipsychotic dose changes. CATIE was a randomized, comparative effectiveness trial for patients with schizophrenia in which a clinician prescribed a double-blind, flexible dose of one of five antipsychotic medications. The mean number of capsules prescribed monthly was evaluated to identify the period following up-titration with the least sample attrition in which dose changes were likely in response to clinical factors. Demographic, efficacy and tolerability variables were evaluated in two regression models predicting a one capsule dose decrease or increase. The mean dose increased to 2.7 capsules over the first 3 months. The post-titration plateau was identified as between 3 and 6 months. Factors associated with dose increases included the Clinical Global Impression Scale at 6 months and change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale between 3 and 6 months. Decreased dosing was associated only with lower patient rated at 6 months global impression of health. Neither tolerability measures, nor body weight was significantly associated with dose changes. In conclusion, dose changes were weakly associated with measures of current or changing clinical status and not affected by measures of side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.