Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22520915›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

The compatibility of prescribing guidelines and the doctor-patient partnership: a primary care mixed-methods study.

Josie Solomon, David K Raynor, Peter Knapp, Karl Atkin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors Influencing Prescribing Decisions of Physicians: A Review.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Effects of discontinuation of chronic medication in primary care: a systematic review of deprescribing trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GPs' use and understanding of the benefits and harms of treatments for long-term conditions: a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Real world partnership with patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Use of statins by medicare beneficiaries post myocardial infarction: poor physician quality or patient-centered care?Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Integrated approach to prescribing education.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Josie SolomonLeicester School of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, Leicester. jsolomon@dmu.ac.uk
David K Raynor
Peter Knapp
Karl Atkin
De Montfort University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK policy expects health professionals to involve patients in decisions about their care (including medicines use) and, at the same time, to follow prescribing guidelines. The compatibility of these approaches is unclear.

aimTo explore the relationship between prescribing guidelines and patient-partnership by exploring the attitudes of patients, GPs and primary care trust (PCT) prescribing advisors. DESIGN AND

settingA mixed-methods study using qualitative, semi-structured interviews followed by a quantitative, questionnaire survey in primary care in Northern England.

methodInterviews were conducted with 14 patients taking a statin or a proton pump inhibitor, eight GPs and two prescribing advisors. A multi-variate sampling strategy was used. Qualitative findings were analysed using framework analysis. Questionnaires based on themes derived from the interviews were distributed to 533 patients and 305 GPs of whom 286 (54%) and 142 (43%) responded.

resultsAreas of tension between guidelines and patient partnership were identified, including potential damage to trust in the doctor and reduced patient choice, through the introduction of the policy maker as a third stakeholder in prescribing decisions. Other areas of tension related to applying single condition guidelines to patients with multiple illnesses, competition for doctors' time and the perception of cost containment. Many GPs coped with these tensions by adopting a flexible approach or prioritising the doctor-patient relationship over guidelines.

conclusionRigidly applied guidelines can limit patient choice and may damage the doctor-patient relationship. GPs need flexibility in order to optimise the implementation of prescribing guidelines, while responding to individuals' needs and preferences.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticePatient ParticipationPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'CommunicationDecision MakingEnglandEvidence-Based MedicineHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsProton Pump InhibitorsSurveys and QuestionnairesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22520915
PMCPMC3310034
OpenAlexW2154804551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.