ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012
Communicating risk to patients and the public.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06837428 (Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM): A Study Protocol to Evaluate the Feasibility of Delivering a Risk Communication Intervention in the Primary Care Setting for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Synthesizing Cohort Study Results to Promote Knowledge Transfer of Safety Data Regarding Gestational Antidepressant Exposure and Offspring Congenital Anomalies: A Test of Concept.Birth defects research · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Guideline
- Effect of different visual presentations on the comprehension of prognostic information: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Pooled it
- Factors shaping the implementation and use of Clinical Cancer Decision Tools by GPs in primary care: a qualitative framework synthesis.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Quantification of the smoking-associated cancer risk with rate advancement periods: meta-analysis of individual participant data from cohorts of the CHANCES consortium.BMC medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Risk expression using likelihood ratios and natural frequencies in Bayesian inference tasks-a preregistered randomized-controlled crossover trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Aiding shared decision making in lung cancer screening: two decision tools.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- The Michael Mason prize: development and feasibility testing of a complex intervention to improve adherence to fracture prevention medicine.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Using human factors methods to mitigate bias in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Article
- Perspectives of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Towards a Decision Aid Assessing Preferences of Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The Dilemma of Choosing.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of the Clinical Utility of Predictive Risk Models for Chemotherapy-Related Symptom Management: Qualitative Exploration Using Focus Groups and Interviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.