Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22520846›Full record

ReviewImmunity2012

Janus kinase deregulation in leukemia and lymphoma.

Edwin Chen, Louis M Staudt, Anthony R Green

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Histone Modifications and Their Targeting in Lymphoid Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Advances in targeted therapy for malignant lymphoma.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edwin ChenCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Louis M Staudt
Anthony R Green
University of Cambridge · GBNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Oncogenic mechanisms and molecular targets in lymphomaZIABC011008 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STAUDT, LOUIS · 2009 to 2025
$21.0M
Molecular diagnosis and outcome prediction in lymphomaZ01BC011006 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STAUDT, LOUIS · 2008 to 2008
$770k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC011006Medical Research Council G0800784Wellcome Trust 079249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic alterations affecting members of the Janus kinase (JAK) family have been discovered in a wide array of cancers and are particularly prominent in hematological malignancies. In this review, we focus on the role of such lesions in both myeloid and lymphoid tumors. Oncogenic JAK molecules can activate a myriad of canonical downstream signaling pathways as well as directly interact with chromatin in noncanonical processes, the interplay of which results in a plethora of diverse biological consequences. Deciphering these complexities is shedding unexpected light on fundamental cellular mechanisms and will also be important for improved diagnosis, identification of new therapeutic targets, and the development of stratified approaches to therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansJanus KinasesLeukemiaLymphomaMiceMutationSignal TransductionChromatinJanus Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22520846
PMCPMC7480953
OpenAlexW2000887760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.