Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22520784›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Factors associated with duration of new antidepressant treatment: analysis of a large primary care database.

Christopher Burton, Niall Anderson, Katie Wilde, Colin R Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Explaining the variation between practices in the duration of new antidepressant treatment: a database cohort study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An end to depression in primary care?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher BurtonCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. chris.burton@ed.ac.uk
Niall Anderson
Katie Wilde
Colin R Simpson

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not known how much the duration of newly prescribed antidepressant treatment is influenced by patient characteristics or practice variation.

aimTo describe the relationship between patient characteristics and the duration of new antidepressant treatment by general practices. DESIGN AND

settingLarge primary care database cohort study of all patients with a newly initiated course of eligible antidepressant treatment during 1 year, from a database of 237 Scottish practices.

methodDetailed prescription data were used to estimate the duration of new antidepressant treatment for each patient. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the influence of patient characteristics on continuation of treatment and, by multilevel modelling, the variation between practices.

resultsA total of 28 027 (2.2%) patients commenced antidepressant treatment during the year; 75% continued beyond 30 days, 56% beyond 90 days, and 40% beyond 180 days. Treatment was less likely to be continued in patients from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: hazard ratio 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 1.29); in patients under 35 years, 1.33 (95% CI = 1.28 to 1.37); and in those for whom the GP recorded no relevant diagnostic code, 1.16 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.18). Models accounted for between 2.2% and 3.9% of the variation in treatment duration.

conclusionPatient demographic characteristics account for relatively little variation in the duration of new antidepressant treatment, though treatment was shorter in younger patients and those with greater socioeconomic deprivation. There is variation in treatment duration between practices and according to whether patients have a depression diagnosis coded in their records.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsDatabases, FactualDepressive DisorderFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'ScotlandSocioeconomic FactorsAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22520784
PMCPMC3268489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.