Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22520683›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

What we talk about when we talk about depression: doctor-patient conversations and treatment decision outcomes.

Alison Karasz, Christopher Dowrick, Richard Byng, Marta Buszewicz, Lucia Ferri, Tim C Olde Hartman, Sandra van Dulmen, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten, Joanne Reeve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Severe Depressive Episode with Psychotic Symptoms and Type 2 Diabetes: A 2010-2017 Longitudinal Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  10. From mental disorder to shared understanding: a non-categorical approach to support individuals with distress in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 'She believed in me'. What patients with depression value in their relationship with practitioners. A secondary analysis of multiple qualitative data sets.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  15. Therapeutic consultations for patients with depressive symptoms.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alison KaraszWorld Trade Center Environmental Health Center, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY, USA. alison.karasz@einstein.yu.edu
Christopher Dowrick
Richard Byng
Marta Buszewicz
Lucia Ferri
Tim C Olde Hartman
Sandra van Dulmen
Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten
Joanne Reeve

Funding

Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to address depression in primary care settings have focused on the introduction of care guidelines emphasising pharmacological treatment. To date, physician adherence remains low. Little is known of the types of information exchange or other negotiations in doctor-patient consultations about depression that influence physician decision making about treatment.

aimThe study sought to understand conversational influences on physician decision making about treatment for depression.

designA secondary analysis of consultation data collected in other studies. Using a maximum variation sampling strategy, 30 transcripts of primary care consultations about distress or depression were selected from datasets collected in three countries. Transcripts were analysed to discover factors associated with prescription of medication.

methodThe study employed two qualitative analysis strategies: a micro-analysis approach, which examines how conversation partners shape the dialogue towards pragmatic goals; and a narrative analysis approach of the problem presentation.

resultsPatients communicated their conceptual representations of distress at the outset of each consultation. Concepts of depression were communicated through the narrative form of the problem presentation. Three types of narratives were identified: those emphasising symptoms, those emphasising life situations, and mixed narratives. Physician decision making regarding medication treatment was strongly associated with the form of the patient's narrative. Physicians made few efforts to persuade patients to accept biomedical attributions or treatments.

conclusionResults of the study provide insight into why adherence to depression guidelines remains low. Data indicate that patient agendas drive the 'action' in consultations about depression. Physicians appear to be guided by common-sense decision-making algorithms emphasising patients' views and preferences.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAntidepressive AgentsCommunicationDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareDepressive DisorderHumansMedical History TakingPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22520683
PMCPMC3252540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.