Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22520664›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Counselling patients about behaviour change: the challenge of talking about diet.

Katie Phillips, Fiona Wood, Clio Spanou, Paul Kinnersley, Sharon A Simpson, Christopher C Butler, PRE-EMPT Team

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement on obesity and cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. QOF should be more about disease and risk factors prevention.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  13. Obesity and chronic disease in younger people: an unfolding crisis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie PhillipsInstitute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff. phillipsk15@cardiff.ac.uk
Fiona Wood
Clio Spanou
Paul Kinnersley
Sharon A Simpson
Christopher C Butler
PRE-EMPT Team

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council G0501283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs obesity levels increase, opportunistic behaviour change counselling from primary care clinicians in consultations about healthy eating is ever more important. However, little is known about the approaches clinicians take with patients.

aimTo describe the content of simulated consultations on healthy eating in primary care, and compare this with the content of smoking cessation consultations. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study of 23 audiotaped simulated healthy eating and smoking cessation consultations between an actor and primary care clinicians (GPs and nurses) within a randomised controlled trial looking at behaviour change counselling.

methodConsultations were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, then analysed inductively using thematic analysis. A thematic framework was developed by all authors and applied to the data. The content of healthy eating consultations was contrasted with that given for smoking cessation.

resultsThere was a lack of consistency and clarity when clinicians discussed healthy eating compared with smoking; in smoking cessation consultations, the content was clearer to both the clinician and patient. There was a lack of specificity about what dietary changes should be made, how changes could be achieved, and how progress could be monitored. Barriers to change were addressed in more depth within the smoking cessation consultations than within the healthy eating encounters.

conclusionAt present, dietary counselling by clinicians in primary care does not typically contain consistent, clear suggestions for specific change, how these could be achieved, and how progress would be monitored. This may contribute to limited uptake and efficacy of dietary counselling in primary care.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyCluster AnalysisCommunicationCounselingDietFamily PracticeHealth BehaviorHumansObesityPatient Education as TopicPatient SimulationPhysician-Patient RelationsSmoking CessationTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID22520664
PMCPMC3252535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.