Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22520658›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Evaluating the transferability of a hospital-based childhood obesity clinic to primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

Jonathan Banks, Deborah J Sharp, Linda P Hunt, Julian P H Shield

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Treatment preference and recruitment to pediatric RCTs: A systematic review.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Confronting child obesity in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  12. Obesity and chronic disease in younger people.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  13. Obesity and chronic disease in younger people: an unfolding crisis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan BanksAcademic Unit of Primary Health Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Deborah J Sharp
Linda P Hunt
Julian P H Shield
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0706-10090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Care Of Childhood Obesity (COCO) clinic at the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (BRHC) uses a multidisciplinary approach comprising a consultant, dietitian, and exercise specialist. The clinic has demonstrated efficacy in managing children's weight but similar clinics are scarce in the UK.

aimThis pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to examine the feasibility of undertaking a fully powered RCT and to gauge whether the COCO model could be effective as a nurse-led clinic in primary care settings. DESIGN AND

settingPatients were randomised to a hospital-based childhood obesity clinic or a nurse-led clinic in a primary care setting in south-west England.

methodChildren aged 5-16 years with a body mass index (BMI) ≥98th centile were referred by GPs to the consultant in charge of the COCO clinic at BRHC. Referred children were clinically screened for suitability and invited into the study. Consenting families were randomised to BRHC or a primary care clinic (PCC) and offered five appointments over 12 months. Clinical effectiveness was measured by change in body mass index standard deviation score (BMI SDS) at 12 months. Other measures included: treatment adherence, quality of life (QOL), and satisfaction. Feasibility was examined by assessing referral, screening, and recruitment data.

resultsA total 152 patients were referred by GPs: 31 (20%) were screened out; 45 (30%) declined to participate. Seventy-six (50%) patients were randomised and 68 provided baseline data (PCC = 42; BRHC = 26); 52 provided outcome data (PCC = 29; BRHC = 23). Mean change in BMI SDS was PCC -0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.27 to -0.07); BRHC -0.15 (95% CI = -0.26 to -0.05). QOL, adherence, and satisfaction data indicated similar positive patterns in both trial arms.

conclusionScreening and recruitment data indicate that primary care is a clinically appropriate setting and acceptable to families. The primary clinical outcome measure (reduction in BMI SDS), along with secondary outcome measures, indicate that primary care has the potential to be effective in providing weight management for children, using the COCO model.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmbulatory CareBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolDietEnglandExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesGeneral PracticeHealth EducationHospitalizationHumansObesityPatient CompliancePatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID22520658
PMCPMC3252541
OpenAlexW2029133658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.