Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22518854›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Rapid determination of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates by colorimetric methods.

Ahmet Yilmaz Coban

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acta medica Philippina · 2025
    Article
  3. Degree of Contamination of Gutta-Percha Points byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Detection ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ahmet Yilmaz CobanOndokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Department of Medical Microbiology, Samsun, Turkey. cobanay2003@gmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, the effectiveness of a rapid and colorimetric nitrate reductase analysis (NRA) method and resazurin microplate assay (REMA) for rapid determination of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus was investigated. A total of 275 clinical isolates of S. aureus were included in the present study. Among these isolates, 151 had the mecA gene and were resistant to methicillin. The remaining 124 isolates were methicillin susceptible and did not have the mecA gene. Cefoxitin MICs of all isolates were detected by NRA, REMA, and reference broth microdilution methods. Category and essential agreement were determined as 100% and 99.6%, respectively, comparing both NRA and REMA with the reference method. No minor, major, or very major discrepancy was observed for either of the methods. The time necessary to have the MIC results was 5 h for NRA, whereas it was 6 h for REMA. Early detection of MRSA is an important public health concern, and the results of this study showed that both of the colorimetric methods are easy to perform and save time in the determination of MRSA. These methods have a potential use for early detection of MRSA for laboratories unable to use molecular techniques.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceColorimetryHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNitrate ReductaseOxazinesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsXanthenesNitrate ReductaseOxazinesresazurinXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID22518854
PMCPMC3405631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.